Feature |
|
Satellite Laser Rangingby Jon Fairall |
The new laser ranging facility on
|
To give the simple version first: a laser is used to measure the distance from the primary mirror of the telescope to the satellite and back again. Given that the orbit of the satellite is known, the position of the telescope can be deduced from the journey time of the light. Changes in the distance can be attributed to movement in the telescope. There is a certain circularity in this argument: the inverse process determines the position of the satellite, i.e: the orbit is calculated from the distance to the satellite, given the position of the ground station. However, the system can be made to work because there is more than one station. In fact, there are some 40 stations around the world dedicated to measuring the position of some half a dozen satellites. At the level of precision required here, all these stations can be considered to be sliding around and bumping up and down on a plastic Earth. But by using results from all of them, a so-called golden orbit can be calculated which ignores or minimises the movement of any one station. An ideal network would have all the stations spread evenly around the world. In fact, the SLR network has only three operational stations in the Southern Hemisphere, and there is a dense clump of them in Europe, but this is sufficient to generate a very accurate determination of the position of a satellite at any point in time. The position and movement of any one station relative to this orbit can then be calculated. There are certain complexities in all this. For a start, the system is capable of measuring the distance to the satellite to within 2 mm. This implies the ability to measure the time to within femtoseconds (it takes light 6.6 x 10-12 seconds to cross 2 mm). Some very clever electronics, developed by the maker of the telescope, Electro-Optical Systems, is employed to do this. Secondly, the process works because, in theory, the satellite is in orbit about the centre of mass of the Earth, with its orbit determined precisely by gravity. In practice, this is only partially true. Residual atmosphere causes drag that can decay the orbit measurably over time. Naturally, this effect can be minimised by moving the satellite further away from the earth. Also, it can be minimised by reducing the size and increasing the mass of the satellite, as well as by making the satellite symmetrical in shape so that whatever the drag, it is at least constant. Thus specialist geodetic satellites such as NASA's LAser GEOlogical Satellite (LAGEOS-1) or the Italian LAGEOS-2, are small round spheres, typically only half a metre or so in diameter. Their outsides are coated with retro-reflectors. Satellites are also affected by solar pressure, which causes a small but finite drift away from the sun at all times. On asymmetric spacecraft, such as the European Space Agency's ERS-1, this force varies with the attitude of the spacecraft; on symmetrical spacecraft it is more nearly constant, but it is always there, and needs to be allowed for in the calculations. A third consideration is that the laser radiation is subject to bending and distortion in the atmosphere, which results in a given ray of light taking a longer path than is necessary. 'Atmospheric distortion is probably the most significant cause of error left in the system,' says John Luck. Currently, moves are afoot to use a dual frequency laser to see whether this can improve things. In exactly the same way as GPS satellites use dual frequencies to reduce the effect of the ionosphere on radio signals, so scientists hope that two frequencies, each of which will be refracted differently as it passes through the atmosphere, will allow for more precise measurement. There is a certain scientific interest in understanding something of the nature of the Earth's dynamics, but results from the SLR system also affect day-to-day positioning very closely. The observatory ranges to the GPS satellites as they come into view of Mt Stromlo, allowing an independent determination of their distance. There is a GPS receiver on a pole just outside the observatory, so the results from the two systems can be compared very precisely, and used to refine the position of the Australian Fiducial Network, and the Australian National Network. Both these are systems of first order base stations that have their positions determined by long-term monitoring of the GPS. All legal position fixes in Australia have to be traceable back to these stations, usually via state networks. Currently, a number of programs are under way to improve the facility, or to extend its usefulness. One plan is to increase the power of the laser up to 100 watts. This would allow it to be used for mapping space debris, the junk left over from rocket launches and discarded satellites. Objects range in size from leftover rocket boosters, through astronauts' fumbled Hasselblad cameras, to flecks of paint. A second project is to fully automate the operation of the site. Currently, the station is manned from 9pm to 4am the next morning. Luck says he would like to institute full-time operation, but only at an affordable price. |
Top of Page |
Table of Contents |
|
|